Mastering Preparation
Guidelines:
Cutting straight to the
chase- you should have the following all set to go:
- Sequence
- ISRC codes (unique ID number that will help track royalties)
- UPC code (your bar code number)
- Any specific "problems" you would like addressed
- Spacing decisions
- Properly mixed tracks
- All licensing for any 'cover songs'
- Know the difference between duplication and replication
Sequence-
With the advent of iTunes and shuffle modes, there is validity to
the argument that the flow of an album is far less important today
than it used to be. But, it is still important. My feeling is that
the listener who is really going to LISTEN to your music is most
likely to hear it in order- either from the CD or from purchasing
the album from iTunes. So pick a sequence that flows well. Yes,
you want to start strong (that doesn't necessarily mean loud or
uptempo), but you also want to be able to build and pull back. There
are a lot of parameters that you can analyze (and over-analyze!)
to rationalize a good sequence- song length, instrumentation, tempo,
key, strength of 'hook', etc. all of which boil down to 'energy'.
Make it flow.
ISRC
codes are issued by your record label. If you ARE the label,
you can register yourself/ your indie label with the US
ISRC Organization. It usually takes a couple of days- Unfortunately,
it is now $75 to register, but it allows easier tracking of digital
performances (on internet and satellite radio) of your tracks and
helps you get paid faster... although you must also register with
Sound Exchange
in order to collect your royalties. All pretty easy and a very good
idea.
UPC
code- this is the bar code that usually goes on the back
of your CD to help retail stores track sales etc. Generally, these
are available from your manufacturer (ie Discmakers, Nimbit or CDBaby)
or your designer... etc. There is usually a fee for these, although
much cheaper to do it with a vendor ($20-$30) instead of registering
yourself ($750). At this point in time (2009) this is an absolute
requirement if you are going to do any digital distribution... which
is where a larger and larger chunk of your income is going to be
derived from.
Specific
Problems- If you have a not-so-great mix and you want the
bass part to be hotter, or you want the vocal to stand out more,
or there's a weird pop in the vocal at 2:17 on track 3, or you feel
like everything is lying a bit flat (these are all things that should
ideally be taken care of in the mix stage...ideally)... then it
would be great to know ahead of time, as these details take more
time to deal with at the mastering stage since we are dealing with
just the stereo mix. Things like- I can never hear the intro to
track 3 because it is so much quieter than everything else... that's
part of what the mastering process should address. But it's helpful
to know what you, the artist, are hearing/feeling with the mixes.
Spacing-
I do not subscribe to the 'every song should have 3 seconds between
them' school. I think, just as with sequence, if someone is listening
to the album as we intend them to, there is a rhythm to it. The
space between songs is dictated by many things as well- tempo, is
it a fade out?, is the next song faster or slower? is the album
overall about space/breathing, or is it a dance/club CD that should
have a pretty tight flow with almost no dead space. So I simply
feel the spacing and try to find that happy medium that works for
every listening situation.
Properly
mixed tracks- well... yup. That would be swell. And better
for you. Mastering is more expensive than mixing time, so take the
extra time in mixing to get it right. Mastering only deals with
the stereo mix file, Not the multitrack session, so there is very
little control over individual elements/instruments of the mix.
You should take the time to review your mixes and make sure that
you are very happy with the mixes as they are prior to sending them
to mastering. Your Mixes should be at the highest possible resolution-
meaning that if you recorded and mixed at 24bits, 44.1kHz, then
your final mixes should be submitted at that resolution.
Licensing
cover songs- No, you cannot simply record your version
of "Back In Black" by AC-DC and then sell the CD. You
must license the rights. They wrote it- they get paid for that.
Just like you will want to be paid every time XM radio plays your
version of the song. Harry
Fox is a great place to start- they make it pretty easy to understand
and let you know if you even CAN purchase a license for the song
you want... (yeah, this kind of brings up the point that it might
be good to do BEFORE you even go spending tons of money recording
the song... ) PS- I just found some great step by step instructions
on licensing at CDBaby- check them out!
Duplication
vs. Replication- The manufacturers do not do a great job
emphasizing the big difference here... DUplication is basically
mass CDR burning ... REplication is the actual pressing of CDs from
a Glass Master. Replication is FAR superior in terms of quality
and longevity for your product. Audio CDRs can actually have errors
burned into them (yes, there is a threshold that they must stay
below, but...). Glass masters created from the mastered audio DATA
set (I create a DDP file set for you) are much better. Yes, they
have a higher minimum run, but in my opinion you get a much better
value.
|